Bank Resolution Act effectively reinstates looters: experts

The Bank Resolution Act-2026, passed with new provisions added overnight, is effectively rehabilitating bank looters and putting the entire banking sector at risk, economic experts, academics, and activists said yesterday.

Clause 18(a) of the law could allow those who previously looted the sector in a planned manner to regain ownership, the speakers warned at a roundtable organised by Voice for Reform at the BDBL building in Karwan Bazar, Dhaka.

Badiul Alam Majumdar, secretary of Shushashoner Jonno Nagorik (Shujan), noted that many of those who looted the sector are yet to be brought to justice.

He said all masterminds behind the takeover of Islami Bank Bangladesh, including S Alam, should be held accountable.

He outlined three steps needed to put the banking sector on a firm footing. First, identifying and ensuring exemplary punishment for perpetrators of banking fraud. Second, implementing systemic reforms such as cashless transactions to prevent recurrence. Lastly, completing institutional reforms, including making Bangladesh Bank an independent constitutional body.

AKM Waresul Karim, dean of the School of Business and Economics at North South University, said the government had resorted to “very low-grade tactics” over the proposed ordinance.

He criticised the Bank Resolution Act as one of its provisions allows shareholders who held ownership immediately before a bank was placed under resolution to apply for reinstatement.

He said the provision blocks the return of long-standing institutional owners like Kuwait Finance House while opening the door for those who acquired ownership by creating “pressure through the DGFI” or through other unethical means.

Toufic Ahmad Choudhury, former director general of the Bangladesh Institute of Bank Management (BIBM), called for bringing willful defaulters to book, saying that no resolution measures would yield results unless those responsible for the current crisis are punished.

He also cautioned that rescheduled loans should not have their default status changed until fully repaid – a rule routinely flouted as elections approach, when defaulters reschedule debts.

“Through this process, they remove themselves from the list of defaulters and become ‘regular’ borrowers. Subsequently, they take the opportunity to secure hundreds of crores of taka in additional loans from the same banks,” he said.

Shawkat Hossain Masum, head of online at Prothom Alo, said it was inevitable that some banks in the country would reach the point of insolvency.

He stated that in November 2022, the central bank claimed that there were no problems in the banking sector, even though the real situation was more or less known to everyone. “It was not that Bangladesh Bank was unaware; rather, it was either helpless in the face of politicisation, complicit in it, or both.”

He claimed that the interim government opted for merging troubled banks as “no government wants to bear the stigma” of closing banks.

Considering various realities, he said merging two weak banks and making the initiative successful is already very difficult. “Expecting five weak banks to merge and succeed together is a very remote aspiration.”

Meanwhile, Professor Mushtaq Khan of SOAS University of London said the interim government should have nationalised or confiscated assets of individuals involved in bank looting.

“Failing to do so was a major mistake,” he said, noting that the manner of the looting makes recovery through collateral seizure difficult.

Sarwar Tusher, a joint convener of the National Citizen Party (NCP), accused the current BNP-led government of setting “extreme examples of politicisation” in the economy within two months of taking office.

Criticising BB Governor Md Mostaqur Rahman, the NCP leader said the governor was a “politically affiliated individual” who reportedly has “past links with S Alam”.

He went on to allege that several ministers of the new government have connections with the controversial business group, warning that a major crisis in the banking sector, similar to that in the energy sector, may be imminent.

Shams Mahmud, former president of the Dhaka Chamber of Commerce & Industry, said Islami Bank was captured through the stock market.

Instead of direct acquisition as entrepreneurs, the bank’s shares were quietly purchased through various anonymous groups and later transferred to a specific group, he added.

“Even if the front door is closed through banking laws, such looting cannot be stopped if the back door, like the stock market, remains open,” said Mahmud.

Asif Khan, president of CFA Society Bangladesh, suggested issuing long-term bonds to depositors as an immediate measure to heal the deep wounds in the banking sector.

He said that while small depositors could be fully repaid, larger depositors might need to accept some “haircut,” or partial losses.