Budget 2026-27: Why tax rebate policy needs structural overhaul

An important objective of income tax policy is to strengthen long-term savings, enhance future financial security, and advance the social protection of taxpayers. In line with this objective, investments and donations in fourteen (14) specified sectors have been made eligible for tax rebate, subject to Section 78 of the Income Tax Act, 2023 and Part III of the Sixth Schedule.

Under the prevailing provisions, a resident normal person taxpayer and a non-resident Bangladeshi (NRB) normal person taxpayer may claim a tax rebate of up to 3% of total income against the tax payable in a tax year, provided the investment or donation meets the prescribed conditions, subject to an overall maximum eligible amount of Tk 1,000,000.

While this incentive is positive in principle, certain inconsistencies and implementation risks warrant a review of both the eligible investment limits and the investment-eligible sectors in the forthcoming national budget.

The tax rebate facility is intended to encourage responsible savings and long-term financial resilience. However, this objective can be undermined if the incentive structure does not sufficiently account for risk management and investor protection.

At present, there are explicit caps on investments in comparatively safer instruments such as government securities, DPS, and life insurance. For instance, investments up to Tk 500,000 in government securities, Tk 120,000 in DPS accounts, and up to 10% of the sum assured in life insurance are treated as eligible for tax rebate. These caps reflect an intent to direct incentives toward safer savings instruments, thereby keeping risk relatively controlled.

In contrast, there is no clearly defined tax-related cap for investment in the stock market under the tax rebate facility. This creates an evident policy imbalance: stricter limits apply to safer instruments, while comparatively higher-risk market participation may be incentivized without equivalent safeguards.

In practice, a segment of ordinary taxpayers enters the stock market primarily to maximize tax rebate benefits. Yet the knowledge, analytical capacity, access to timely information, and risk tolerance required for equity market participation vary significantly across taxpayers.

Consequently, uninformed or inadequately assessed investments increase the likelihood of capital loss, which may directly conflict with the stated objective of strengthening future security.

This contradiction is material. The tax rebate is not merely a mechanism of tax reduction; it is a policy instrument that influences taxpayer financial behavior. If the incentive structure unintentionally encourages participation in higher-risk instruments without appropriate protection measures, it may lead to adverse outcomes, reduced household savings, heightened financial stress, and weakened long-term security.

Recent market-related events have further affected investor confidence. Developments such as restructuring decisions in the financial sector, uncertainty regarding shareholder outcomes in certain institutional changes, and the closure of some finance companies have heightened perceived risk among general investors.

In an environment of reduced trust, ordinary investors are more likely to be influenced by short-term signals and informal information channels, and they often lack effective institutional protection during periods of market volatility.

Most importantly, taxpayers who invest in the stock market for the purpose of tax rebate currently lack a visible and effective risk mitigation or protection framework. A tax rebate does not safeguard invested capital if an issuer becomes insolvent or if the market experiences significant decline.

Therefore, a policy designed to promote future security may inadvertently expose ordinary taxpayers to capital loss, raising concerns regarding both the practicality and fairness of the incentive design.

In view of the above, it is submitted that the National Board of Revenue (NBR) may consider redefining the eligible investment limits and the scope and conditions of eligible sectors under the tax rebate facility in the forthcoming budget 2026-27.

Proposed policy measures:

1. Increase the investment tax rebate ceiling

Raising the ceiling from Tk 10 lakh to Tk 20 lakh signals a forward-looking, investor-friendly policy shift, encouraging greater participation in formal savings and long-term financial planning.

2. Rational enhancement of limits for safer savings instruments

Existing caps for safer instruments may be reviewed and rationally increased. For example, the maximum eligible investment limit may be raised to Tk 2,000,000 for government securities and Tk 360,000 for DPS accounts. Such adjustments would encourage secure savings behavior and reduce the incentive-driven shift toward higher-risk instruments.

3. Establish a protection framework for tax-rebate-eligible stock market investments

A defined protection mechanism should be introduced for the rebate-eligible portion of stock market investments. Coverage or compensation in qualifying events such as issuer insolvency may be considered. Without such a framework, encouraging ordinary taxpayers into higher-risk instruments raises concerns of equity and fairness.

4. Adopt a risk-adjusted incentive structure

A balanced policy is required so that taxpayers are not compelled to concentrate on risk-prone instruments to maximize rebate benefits. Incentives should reflect both risk and protective safeguards to align with broader objectives of social protection and long-term security.

5. Treat dividend withholding as final tax

To enhance compliance simplicity and transparency, tax deducted at source (TDS) on dividends may be considered as final tax settlement, subject to legislative alignment. This would reduce administrative complexity and provide certainty to taxpayers.

6. Implement an annual investment awareness campaign (January–March)

A structured national campaign should be undertaken annually to improve taxpayer understanding of investment options, risks, and informed decision-making. Improved awareness would support planned participation and contribute to meeting short-term financing needs through stable instruments.

The tax rebate facility is an important policy tool to promote savings, strengthen future security, and advance social protection. Accordingly, the design of eligible limits and sectors should incorporate risk awareness, protection measures, and a pragmatic incentive balance.

The proposed measures would support safer long-term savings among ordinary taxpayers, reduce undue risk-taking in equity markets driven primarily by tax incentives, and improve alignment between the incentive framework and its intended policy objectives.

The writer is a fellow chartered accountant and financial analyst. He can be reached at faysal.aqc@gmail.com